In Battlefield 6, the Xeon W-11955M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon W-11955M
- Is 6 months and 4 days newer – May 11, 2021 vs Nov 05, 2020
- Is 6 months and 4 days newer
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 35 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 67% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Xeon W-11955M vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon W-11955M vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon W-11955M vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon W-11955M
May 11th, 2021
Cores
8-core
67%
L3 Cache
24 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon W-11955M May 11th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 11th, 2021 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| $623.00 | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | AM4 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
