Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon Gold 5317 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 152 days older than Xeon Gold 5317.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon Gold 5317 - 146 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon Gold 5317 - 105 vs 150 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon Gold 5317 - 32 vs 24 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$345
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $345 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Apr 6th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon Gold 5317 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 6th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon Gold | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ice Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |