In Minecraft, the Xeon E5649 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5649
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 2% faster in Minecraft – 1077 vs 1058 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Minecraft
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 7 years and 7 months newer
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
1077 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
233 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
