In Deathloop, the Xeon E5649 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 7900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5649
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 80 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
Ryzen 9 7900X
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 241 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen 9 7900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$314
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen 9 7900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
54%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 7900X Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
