In Deathloop, the Xeon E5649 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 1600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5649
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Ryzen 5 1600
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer – Apr 11, 2017 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 6 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen 5 1600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$58.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5649 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600 Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $219.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM4 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
