In Deathloop, the Xeon E5649 is slightly slower than the Core i9-11900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5649
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i9-11900K
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5649 vs Core i9-11900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
173 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i9-11900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i9-11900K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-11900K
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900K Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $539.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 750 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
