In Atomfall, the Xeon E5649 is slightly faster than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5649
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Feb 14, 2011 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
