In Deathloop, the Xeon E5649 is slightly faster than the Core i7-4765T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5649
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Core i7-4765T
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer – Jun 02, 2013 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 2 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-4765T: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
218 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$498.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-4765T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-4765T in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4765T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4765T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
