In Deathloop, the Xeon E5649 is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5649
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 11 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5649 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
38%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
52%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
