In Deathloop, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer – Mar 16, 2010 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Xeon X3430
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1156 |
80W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
