In Rust, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2678 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 80 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Up to 4% faster in Rust – 219 vs 210 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Xeon E5-2678 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
96%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
81%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2678 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
80W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
