In Atomfall, the Xeon E5645 is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 80 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 242 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Oct 19th, 2023
Average FPS
242 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Oct 19th, 2023
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2688
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
23180
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
19%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX
Oct 19th, 2023
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX Oct 19th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $3,899.00 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | sTR5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
