In Atomfall, the Xeon E5645 is slower than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 80 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Mar 08, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Mar 8th, 2022
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$3220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.06/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Mar 8th, 2022
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1972
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
16818
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
9%
L3 Cache
12 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
Mar 8th, 2022
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX Mar 8th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 8th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $6,499.00 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | WRX8 |
80W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
