In War Thunder, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 9% faster in War Thunder – 290 vs 266 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in War Thunder
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Aug 31, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
War Thunder FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Average FPS
290 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
217 FPS
100%
Price, $
$128.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Aug 31st, 2017
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1900X Aug 31st, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
