In Rust, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 1600. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 5% faster in Rust – 219 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer – Apr 11, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen 5 1600: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
50 FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.4
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Ryzen 5 1600 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 1600
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600 Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $219.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM4 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
