In Atomfall, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the FX-9590. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 80 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
FX-9590
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 191 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Jun 11, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs FX-9590: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
192 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$282.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs FX-9590 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs FX-9590 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM3+ |
80W | Power Consumption | 220W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
