In Deathloop, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop – 244 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 10% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
44%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
80 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
