In Rust, the Xeon E5645 is same performance as the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Is 2 months and 7 days newer – Mar 16, 2010 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 2 months and 7 days newer
Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
80%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 35W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
