In War Thunder, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the Core i7-4702HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
No clear advantages
Core i7-4702HQ
- Up to 5% faster in War Thunder – 279 vs 266 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in War Thunder
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – May 27, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 37 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
War Thunder FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-4702HQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-4702HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-4702HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4702HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4702HQ May 27th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 37W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
