In Rust, the Xeon E5645 is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i7-10700K
- Up to 13% faster in Rust – 236 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Rust
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-10700K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$380
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
52%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700K Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
