In Atomfall, the Xeon E5645 is slower than the Core i5-13600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Core i5-13600K
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall – 239 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Atomfall
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5645 vs Core i5-13600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
239 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$319
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i5-13600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5645 vs Core i5-13600K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
43%
L3 Cache
12 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
52%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-13600K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
14-core
100%
L3 Cache
24 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13600K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $319.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
