In Control, the Xeon E5640 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5640
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 80 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5640 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5640 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5640 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
6%
L3 Cache
12 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | TRX4 |
80W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
