In Control, the Xeon E5640 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5640
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Xeon E5640 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5640 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5640 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
73%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
