In Rust, the Xeon E5640 is same performance as the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5640
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
FX-8370
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Sep 02, 2014 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5640 vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
42 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5640 vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5640 vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM3+ |
80W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
