In The Last of Us Part II, the Xeon E5640 is faster than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5640
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 199 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Is 14 years and 9 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Xeon E5640 vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
85%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5640 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5640 vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
20%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
55%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5640 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
