In Rust, the Xeon E5630 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-1650 v2. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 80 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Xeon E5-1650 v2
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 213 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer – Sep 10, 2013 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 years and 5 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Xeon E5-1650 v2: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
45 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Xeon E5-1650 v2 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Xeon E5-1650 v2 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-1650 v2
Sep 10th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1650 v2 Sep 10th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA2011 |
80W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
