In Deathloop, the Xeon E5630 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 7960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 80 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 13 years and 7 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Oct 19th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1109.82
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Oct 19th, 2023
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2829
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
23537
100%
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen Threadripper 7960X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
12 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 7960X
Oct 19th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 7960X Oct 19th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | sTR5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
