In Atomfall, the Xeon E5630 is slower than the Ryzen 9 9900X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 80 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 33% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X
- Up to 34% faster in Atomfall – 251 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 34% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 5 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 9 9900X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$419
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 9 9900X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9900X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $499.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
