In Rust, the Xeon E5630 is slower than the Ryzen 5 8400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
Ryzen 5 8400F
- Up to 25% faster in Rust – 261 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Rust
- Is 14 years and 16 days newer – Apr 01, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 16 days newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 5 8400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 8400F
Apr 1st, 2024
Average FPS
261 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
79 FPS
100%
Price, $
$163.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 5 8400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 5 8400F in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
60%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
60%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 8400F
Apr 1st, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 8400F Apr 1st, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $170.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM5 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
