In Deathloop, the Xeon E5630 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 7235HS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Ryzen 5 7235HS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 5 7235HS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 5 7235HS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Ryzen 5 7235HS in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 7235HS
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 7235HS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | FP7 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon 660M |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
