In Atomfall, the Xeon E5630 is slightly slower than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
FX-8300
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer – Oct 23, 2012 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 2 years and 7 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
72%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM3+ |
80W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
