In Atomfall, the Xeon E5630 is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 14 years and 10 months newer – Jan 30, 2025 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 30th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$534
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 30th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
