In Atomfall, the Xeon E5630 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9820X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 80 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i9-9820X
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 213 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Core i9-9820X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
213 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$619.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.9/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i9-9820X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i9-9820X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
40%
L3 Cache
12 MB
73%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9820X
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9820X Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $889.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA2066 |
80W | Power Consumption | 165W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
