In Deathloop, the Xeon E5630 is slightly slower than the Core i9-13900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
Core i9-13900
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Deathloop
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 12 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.87/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
50%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
