In Atomfall, the Xeon E5630 is slightly slower than the Core i7-840QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
Core i7-840QM
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 months and 4 days newer – Jun 20, 2010 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 3 months and 4 days newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Core i7-840QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i7-840QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i7-840QM in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-840QM
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
1.867 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-840QM Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $568.00 |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
