In Atomfall, the Xeon E5630 is slightly slower than the Core i5-3470. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
Core i5-3470
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 191 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer – Jun 01, 2012 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 2 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 77 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Core i5-3470: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
191 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i5-3470 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i5-3470 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-3470
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-3470 Jun 1st, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $184.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 77W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 2500 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
