In Deathloop, the Xeon E5630 is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5630
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
Core i5-10400
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5630 vs Core i5-10400: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i5-10400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5630 vs Core i5-10400 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
