In Rust, the Xeon E5620 is same performance as the Xeon X3450. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer – Mar 16, 2010 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Xeon X3450
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Xeon X3450: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Xeon X3450 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Xeon X3450 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3450
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.667 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3450 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $241.00 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1156 |
80W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
