In Deathloop, the Xeon E5620 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 80 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Oct 03, 2018 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
98%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | SP3r2 |
80W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
