In Rust, the Xeon E5620 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 9950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 80 vs 170 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
Ryzen 9 9950X
- Up to 37% faster in Rust – 286 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Rust
- Is 14 years and 5 months newer – Aug 15, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 5 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 9 9950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 9950X
Aug 15th, 2024
Average FPS
286 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.95/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 9 9950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 9 9950X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
56%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
47%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 9950X
Aug 15th, 2024
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9950X Aug 15th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 15th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $649.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM5 |
80W | Power Consumption | 170W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
