In Deathloop, the Xeon E5620 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 9 5900XT. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 80 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 24% less energy
Ryzen 9 5900XT
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer – Jul 31, 2024 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 14 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 9 5900XT: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 5900XT
Jul 31st, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$349
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 9 5900XT in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 9 5900XT in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
73%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
56%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5900XT
Jul 31st, 2024
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900XT Jul 31st, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 31st, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $349.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM4 |
80W | Power Consumption | 105W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
