Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3887 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E5620 - 253 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
253
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$289.02
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $289.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |