Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 4677 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 80 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than Xeon E5620 - 207 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5620
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5620 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
