In Deathloop, the Xeon E5620 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 7435HS. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Ryzen 7 7435HS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 224 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 7 7435HS in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
59%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 7435HS
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 7435HS |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | – |
| – | MSRP | – |
Server | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | FP7 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
