In Deathloop, the Xeon E5620 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 5 1600X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Ryzen 5 1600X
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer – Apr 11, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 26 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 5 1600X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Average FPS
218 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$97.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 5 1600X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
67%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 1600X
Apr 11th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 1600X Apr 11th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $249.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM4 |
80W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
