In Rust, the Xeon E5620 is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 1200. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Ryzen 3 1200
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 215 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer – Jul 27, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 3 1200: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Average FPS
215 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
100%
Price, $
$79.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 3 1200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Ryzen 3 1200 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 1200
Jul 27th, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 1200 Jul 27th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | AM4 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
