In Rust, the Xeon E5620 is slightly slower than the Core i9-7920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 80 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Core i9-7920X
- Up to 11% faster in Rust – 230 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Rust
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer – Sep 10, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 7 years and 5 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Core i9-7920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$395
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.71/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i9-7920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i9-7920X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
12 MB
73%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-7920X
Sep 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
16.5 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-7920X Sep 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $1,199.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA2066 |
80W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
