In Atomfall, the Xeon E5620 is slower than the Core i9-12900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Core i9-12900
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall – 236 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Atomfall
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Core i9-12900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-12900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
236 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
177 FPS
100%
Price, $
$419.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i9-12900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i9-12900 in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
52%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900 Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $519.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
