In Rust, the Xeon E5620 is slightly slower than the Core i7-3770K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
No clear advantages
Core i7-3770K
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 211 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Apr 29, 2012 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 77 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 4% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Core i7-3770K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
43 FPS
100%
Price, $
$209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i7-3770K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i7-3770K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
68%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $313.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1155 |
| 80W | Power Consumption | 77W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
