In Deathloop, the Xeon E5620 is slightly faster than the Core i7-2600K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Xeon E5620
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 16% less energy – 80 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 16% less energy
Core i7-2600K
- Is 9 months and 25 days newer – Jan 09, 2011 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 9 months and 25 days newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Xeon E5620 vs Core i7-2600K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i7-2600K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5620 vs Core i7-2600K in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5620
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
70%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-2600K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Xeon E5620 Mar 16th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-2600K Jan 9th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | $317.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1366 | Socket | LGA1155 |
80W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 3000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
